|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Thanks RIck! The resampling worked great. I render at an even multiple
of my final resolution. In my case 1024x768 for a final of 512x384. I
use Photoshop to knock it down and it looks great. I compared the
result to 512x384 AA and I couldn't tell the difference. The stars are
still a little dimmer, but at least they are clearly visible.
On Sun, 23 May 1999 11:52:43 +0100, "Rick" <kit### [at] dial pipex com>
wrote:
>I have had this, make your stars bigger, simple but works, erither that or
>dont render with AA, get the imge into psp or the like and resample it down
>a few %, that works well sometimes (especially on stars!)
>
>Rick
>
>Duke Nukem <non### [at] yo bidness> wrote in message
>news:3747b849.178051618@news.povray.org...
>> Here's my problem. I'm working on a space scene. It's all done, and I
>> want to use AA to make the ship look good. But, when I do that, the
>> starfield in the background virtually disappears. I can barely see the
>> stars, they're real dim because of the blending of AA. I tried
>> pre-rendering the background and using an image map, but it has no
>> effect. I'm using the stars.inc file included with POV (starfield1 to
>> be precise). Does anyone have any ideas how I can use AA, but still
>> make my stars look as good as they do without it? Or, am I stuck with
>> just not using AA? Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Scott Holland
>
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |